Radicalisation Foresights
An Analysis of Toxic Tweets Related to Climate Change, Covid-19, and Immigration. D 6.3 June 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11395845Abstract
This report presents an analysis of polarisation in online debates. It seeks to unpack the ways
through which toxic tweets can stimulate polarisation. Specifically, we trace communication
patterns on Twitter to examine levels of toxicity in online exchanges related to the three themes:
climate change, Covid-19, and immigration. We used the google-generated Perspective API
Toxicity tool to conduct an analysis of the perceived toxicity levels of tweets from both pro- and anti- faction groups within these thematic categorisations. An initial analysis reveals that
the most toxic tweets identified were related to the issue of immigration, with strong overlaps
to debates surrounding COVID-19 and the vaccination. Accordingly, we proceeded with an
analysis of the dataset to open a wider academic discussion of the links between toxic tweets,
polarisation, and potential for radicalisation. These findings are related to a discussion of
ontological security, which is a theoretical perspective that can help us begin to understand the
rationale that may lead users to engage in toxic tweeting. The report concludes with a summary
of these theoretical conclusions on the significance of social media for viewing polarisation
and political ideologies.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 D.Rad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
